|
Scholars have found that while women across cultures do on average two-thirds of all household labor, only 20-30% of women find these gendered distributions unfair (Coltrane, 2000; Mikula, 1998). Meanwhile, previous research on moral reasoning about gender inequality demonstrates that men and boys tend to employ mostly conventional, or norm affirming, reasoning and therefore also find women doing most of the housework as legitimate. In other words across ages and genders, individuals have been found to be less morally critical of gendered unequal distribution of labor in the home than expected. The challenge for moral developmental researchers and scholars of household labor is to ascertain how family members come to accept seemingly apparent unequal distribution of gendered housework. A limitation of previous research has been that scholars mainly focused on only one of the members of a household’s evaluations of gendered housework (mostly women) and focused their research within the United States. To address these shortcomings, Allegra is currently in Seoul studying the moral reasoning employed by children (9-11, 12-14, & 16-18) and at times their parents (12 families) about the gendered division of housework. In this seminar Allegra will introduce previous work in this area (including the data that she already collected in China with 60 children and 12 families) and share preliminary data already collected in Seoul. After reviewing together some of the data, the following questions will be discussed: 1) How do children make sense of inequality in the division of housework? 2) How do parents make sense of this issue, and does it differ from their children's understandings? 3) What are the implications for future research in this area?
|
|